2/3 FREE ARTICLES LEFT REGISTER FOR MORE | BECOME AN HBR SUBSCRIBER


Subscribe
Sign In Register

WHAT TO READ NEXT

How to Make Yourself Work When You Just Don’t Want To

MANAGING YOURSELF
The Disciplined Pursuit of Less
Greg McKeown
AUGUST 08, 2012
SAVE SHARE COMMENT TEXT SIZE PRINT

RECOMMENDED


HBR Guide to Building Your Business Case...
COMMUNICATION BOOK
59.95 ADD TO CART

Playing to Win Strategy Toolkit
STRATEGY & EXECUTION BOOK
250.00 ADD TO CART

HBR Guide to Data Analytics Basics for...
STRATEGY & EXECUTION BOOK
49.95 ADD TO CART
Why don’t successful people and organizations automatically become very successful? One important explanation is due to what I call “the clarity paradox,” which can be summed up in four predictable phases:

Phase 1: When we really have clarity of purpose, it leads to success.
Phase 2: When we have success, it leads to more options and opportunities.
Phase 3: When we have increased options and opportunities, it leads to diffused efforts.
Phase 4: Diffused efforts undermine the very clarity that led to our success in the first place.

Curiously, and overstating the point in order to make it, success is a catalyst for failure.

We can see this in companies that were once darlings of Wall Street, but later collapsed. In his book How the Mighty Fall, Jim Collins explored this phenomenon and found that one of the key reasons for these failures was that companies fell into “the undisciplined pursuit of more.” It is true for companies and it is true for careers.

Here’s a more personal example: For years, Enric Sala was a professor at the prestigious Scripps Institution of Oceanography in La Jolla, California. But he couldn’t kick the feeling that the career path he was on was just a close counterfeit for the path he should really be on. So, he left academia and went to work for National Geographic. With that success came new and intriguing opportunities in Washington D.C. that again left him feeling he was close to the right career path, but not quite there yet. His success had distracted him. After a couple of years, he changed gears again in order to be what he really wanted: an explorer-in-residence with National Geographic, spending a significant portion of his time diving in the most remote locations, using his strengths in science and communications to influence policy on a global scale. (Watch Enric Sala speak about his important work at TED). The price of his dream job was saying no to the many good, parallel paths he encountered.

What can we do to avoid the clarity paradox and continue our upward momentum? Here are three suggestions:

First, use more extreme criteria. Think of what happens to our closets when we use the broad criteria: “Is there a chance that I will wear this someday in the future?” The closet becomes cluttered with clothes we rarely wear. If we ask, “Do I absolutely love this?” then we will be able to eliminate the clutter and have space for something better. We can do the same with our career choices.

By applying tougher criteria we can tap into our brain’s sophisticated search engine. If we search for “a good opportunity,” then we will find scores of pages for us to think about and work through. Instead, we can conduct an advanced search and ask three questions: “What am I deeply passionate about?” and “What taps my talent?” and “What meets a significant need in the world?” Naturally there won’t be as many pages to view, but that is the point of the exercise. We aren’t looking for a plethora of good things to do. We are looking for our absolute highest point of contribution.



Enric is one of those relatively rare examples of someone who is doing work that he loves, that taps his talent, and that serves an important need in the world. His main objective is to help create the equivalent of National Parks to protect the last pristine places in the ocean — a significant contribution.

Second, ask “What is essential?” and eliminate the rest. Everything changes when we give ourselves permission to eliminate the nonessentials. At once, we have the key to unlock the next level of our lives. Get started by:

Conducting a life audit. All human systems tilt towards messiness. In the same way that our desks get cluttered without us ever trying to make them cluttered, so our lives get cluttered as well-intended ideas from the past pile up. Most of these efforts didn’t come with an expiration date. Once adopted, they live on in perpetuity. Figure out which ideas from the past are important and pursue those. Throw out the rest.
Eliminating an old activity before you add a new one. This simple rule ensures that you don’t add an activity that is less valuable than something you are already doing.
Third, beware of the endowment effect. Also known as the divestiture aversion, the endowment effect refers to our tendency to value an item more once we own it. One particularly interesting study was conducted by Kahneman, Knetsch and Thaler (published here) where consumption objects (e.g. coffee mugs) were randomly given to half the subjects in an experiment, while the other half were given pens of equal value. According to traditional economic theory (the Coase Theorem), about half of the people with mugs and half of the people with pens will trade. But they found that significantly fewer than this actually traded. The mere fact of ownership made them less willing to part with their own objects. As a simple illustration in your own life, think of how a book on your shelf that you haven’t used in years seems to increase in value the moment you think about giving it away.

Tom Stafford describes a cure for this that we can apply to career clarity: Instead of asking, “How much do I value this item?” we should ask “If I did not own this item, how much would I pay to obtain it?” And the same goes for career opportunities. We shouldn’t ask, “How much do I value this opportunity?” but “If I did not have this opportunity, how much would I be willing to sacrifice in order to obtain it?”

If success is a catalyst for failure because it leads to the “undisciplined pursuit of more,” then one simple antidote is the disciplined pursuit of less. Not just haphazardly saying no, but purposefully, deliberately, and strategically eliminating the nonessentials. Not just once a year as part of a planning meeting, but constantly reducing, focusing and simplifying. Not just getting rid of the obvious time wasters, but being willing to cut out really terrific opportunities as well. Few appear to have the courage to live this principle, which may be why it differentiates successful people and organizations from the very successful ones.

Greg McKeown is the author of the New York Times bestseller Essentialism: The Disciplined Pursuit of Less and speaks 50 times a year at major companies and conferences. He recently launched The Essential Forum where people come together every 90 days to design their highest contribution. Greg did his graduate work at Stanford. Connect @GregoryMcKeown.
This article is about MANAGING YOURSELF

FOLLOW THIS TOPIC
Related Articles


UP NEXT IN CAREER PLANNING
What Mentors Wish Their Mentees Knew

Sanjay Saint, MD; Vineet Chopra, MD

UP NEXT IN INFLUENCE
Prioritize Your Life Before Your Manager Does It for You

Greg McKeown

UP NEXT IN CAREER PLANNING
4 Habits of People Who Are Always Learning New Skills

Mike Kehoe
Related Products


SALES & MARKETING
Using Customer Journey Maps to Improve Customer Experience
HBR Digital Article

8.95
VIEW DETAILS

ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
West Point: The Cheating Incident (A)
Case

8.95
VIEW DETAILS

LEADERSHIP & MANAGING PEOPLE
Acer America: Development of the Aspire
Case

8.95
VIEW DETAILS
Comments

POST
2 COMMENTS
Roland Roland Leblanc a year ago

I like this article; I have started to move my=self into voluntary simplicity lately; and this article gives me a clue on how I can get to improve even further what I have started. It also helps me to continue doing a good clean=up in my life. Nice article; so useful to see ahead with clarity where we are heading when we keep the unnecessary stuff... Being is far more rewarding that having or doing I think; what do you think?
Roland ♀

REPLY 0 0 JOIN THE CONVERSATION
POSTING GUIDELINES
We hope the conversations that take place on HBR.org will be energetic, constructive, and thought-provoking. To comment, readers must sign in or register. And to ensure the quality of the discussion, our moderating team will review all comments and may edit them for clarity, length, and relevance. Comments that are overly promotional, mean-spirited, or off-topic may be deleted per the moderators' judgment. All postings become the property of Harvard Business Publishing.

Partner Center






Subscribe Today + Save!
EXPLORE HBR

The Latest
Most Popular
All Topics
Magazine Archive
Video
Audio
Webinars
Subscriber Exclusives
My Library
Newsletters
HBR Ascend
HBR STORE

Article Reprints
Books
Cases
Collections
Magazine Issues
HBR Guide Series
HBR 20-Minute Managers
HBR Must Reads
Tools
ABOUT HBR

Contact Us
Advertise with Us
Subscribe
Information for Booksellers/Retailers
Masthead
Global Editions
Media Inquiries
Guidelines for Authors
HBR Analytic Services
HBR SUBSCRIBER ASSISTANCE

U.S./Canada:
800.274.3214
harvard@cdsfulfillment.com
hbr.org/subscriberservices
International:
+44.1858.438.412
(Asia Pacific: +612.8296.5401)
hbr@subscription.co.uk
subscription.co.uk/hbr/help
HBR.ORG CUSTOMER ASSISTANCE

U.S./Canada:
800.988.0886
International:
617.783.7500
Email:
customerservice@harvardbusiness.org
Customer Service Help & FAQs
Copyright Permissions
FOLLOW HBR

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Google+
Your Newsreader

About Us Careers Privacy Policy Copyright Information Trademark Policy
Harvard Business Publishing: Higher Education Corporate Learning Harvard Business Review
Copyright © 2018 Harvard Business School Publishing. All rights reserved. Harvard Business Publishing is an affiliate of Harvard Business School.

Women at Work
A new podcast from HBR. Conversations about the workplace, and women’s place in it.
LISTEN AND SUBSCRIBE